Skip to content

Mentor Meeting Summary

  • Date: July 26th, 2026

Main Discussion

  • The meeting focused on preparing the final project presentation and evaluation.
  • The mentor emphasized that the presentation should provide an honest analysis of the project rather than presenting it as an entirely successful product.
  • We discussed approaches for organizing the presentation, supporting the analysis with project data, and highlighting lessons learned.

Mentor Feedback

Focus on Project Analysis

  • The presentation should emphasize:
    • Major project issues.
    • Why they occurred.
    • How they affected the project.
    • What could have been done differently.
  • Analysis should be supported by project metrics and evidence rather than opinions.

Improve Presentation Structure

  • Instead of presenting each practice area independently, organize the presentation around the project's major challenges (e.g., migration), discussing each issue from multiple software engineering perspectives.
  • A timeline or issue-based narrative was recommended to better connect planning, tracking, configuration management, requirements, and other practice areas.

Use Data to Support Conclusions

  • Collect project metrics that demonstrate:
    • Planned vs. completed work.
    • Estimated vs. actual effort.
    • Sprint progress.
    • Team workload distribution.
  • Explain how these metrics could have revealed project problems earlier and informed better decisions.

Be Honest and Objective

  • Avoid hiding project weaknesses or presenting an overly positive narrative.
  • The mentor stressed that objective analysis is more valuable than trying to justify mistakes.
  • Team performance should be discussed using evidence and metrics rather than personal opinions.

Presentation Preparation

  • Create the presentation from scratch instead of reusing previous slides.
  • Begin with a broad collection of ideas and supporting data before selecting the final presentation slides.
  • Prepare additional backup slides containing supporting information for the Q&A session.

Artifact Review

  • Project artifacts will be reviewed before the presentation and may also be revisited afterwards.
  • The presentation should complement the repository rather than attempting to cover every detail.

Agreed Actions

  • Build a new presentation focused on project analysis rather than feature demonstration.
  • Organize the narrative around key project challenges and lessons learned.
  • Support all conclusions with metrics and repository evidence.
  • Prepare backup slides for detailed questions.
  • Share a draft presentation with the mentor for review before the final presentation.

IU Alumni Platform Documentation